01
Precision
Meticulous in determining what a client actually needs — and exact in how we deliver it.
Since 2000 we have represented governments, trade bodies and multinationals in the proceedings that decide whether a business can trade, and in the frameworks that decide how it may hold data. Two disciplines, deliberately. Both led end to end by the one Director who sets the strategy.
Bizilance Legal Consultants Mitcham, EnglandAbu Dhabi, UAE
The firm was founded on a straightforward observation: in trade remedy and in data protection, the advice that matters is the advice that survives contact with a regulator. A memorandum that reads well and cannot be filed is not a deliverable. So the practice was built around the proceeding rather than around the opinion — around questionnaires, verification visits, injury margins, hearings, transfer maps and audit trails.
That shape is also why the practice is narrow. Anti-dumping work and privacy work look unrelated from outside; from inside they are the same discipline applied to different regimes — a factual record built to withstand an authority's scrutiny, assembled under a deadline that will not move. Two disciplines is what a firm can hold at that standard without handing the second one to someone junior.
We work for exporters and importers facing investigation, for producers seeking relief, for trade associations coordinating an industry response, and for businesses bringing a data estate into line with the UAE PDPL and the GDPR. The mandate ends when the matter is implemented — not when the advice is delivered.
The practice did not arrive at two disciplines and sixteen jurisdictions by plan. Each step was a client taking us somewhere we had to learn properly before we could advise.
2000
Bizilance is established to advise on international trade and regulatory affairs. The first mandates are anti-dumping investigations — the work that still sets the firm's standard for how a factual record is built.
Trade remedy
2008
Representation widens beyond a home authority to proceedings in Asia and Europe. Appearing before a dozen investigating authorities is what taught the practice that no two records are assembled the same way.
Multi-jurisdictional
2018
The GDPR takes effect and clients start asking the same question about data that they had been asking about goods: what will an authority accept? The privacy practice is opened as a discipline in its own right, not a service line.
Privacy & data
Today
The practice runs from Mitcham and Abu Dhabi, with first-hand engagement experience from Dubai to São Paulo to Seoul. The scope has been deliberately narrowed twice since — both times to protect the standard on what remains.
Current
There is no pitch team and no handover. The Director who assesses the matter is the one who signs the submission and the one who answers the phone when the authority comes back.
Step 01
We establish what is actually at stake — exposure, deadlines, the authority's practice — and tell you plainly whether the matter is worth running.
You get a position, not a proposal
Step 02
Strategy set against the regime that will decide it: what to argue, what to concede, what evidence has to exist before the argument can be made.
A route with the trade-offs named
Step 03
Questionnaires, submissions, verification and hearings — carried by the same people who built the strategy, before the authority that will rule on it.
A record built to withstand scrutiny
Step 04
A determination or a framework only counts once it is operating inside the business. We stay until it is, and we say what has to be reviewed and when.
Something your team can run
Four commitments that decide how we take instructions, what we will tell you, and what we put our name to.
01
Meticulous in determining what a client actually needs — and exact in how we deliver it.
02
We serve clients with passion and honesty — saying what we think, not what is easiest to hear.
03
We build and maintain trustworthy relationships that hold long after an engagement closes.
04
Deep subject knowledge and professional proficiency, earned in practice rather than claimed.
Every engagement is led personally by the same Director, with decades of first-hand industry experience. Your objectives define the scope — never the other way around.
Director
Trade Remedies & International Trade
A leading authority on international trade remedies and regulatory affairs, advising governments, trade bodies and multinationals across Asia, Europe and the Middle East for over two decades.
First-hand engagement experience — matters run before the authority, not referrals passed to a local firm.
The Americas practice is Brazil-based and trade-remedy only. We will say so rather than take a matter we cannot run first-hand.
Not on the list? Most cross-border matters still touch a regime we run. Ask — and we will tell you honestly if it does not.
See the mapWe are guided by the highest standards of professional ethics, a client-focused approach, exceeding expectations and — above all — being solution providers.
Our mission
Tell us what the matter is and we will tell you whether it is worth running. A senior team member replies within one business day.